Side-by-side comparison
MiniMax M2.7 vs Grok Code Fast 1
| MiniMax M2.7 | Grok Code Fast 1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | xAI |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 196,608 | 256,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.2600 | 0.2000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 1.2000 | 1.5000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.7 or Grok Code Fast 1?
MiniMax M2.7 is cheaper than Grok Code Fast 1 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.12 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, MiniMax M2.7 or Grok Code Fast 1?
Grok Code Fast 1 has the larger context window at 256k tokens versus 197k tokens for MiniMax M2.7. That means Grok Code Fast 1 can ingest about 1.3x as much text per request.
What is the difference between MiniMax M2.7 and Grok Code Fast 1?
MiniMax M2.7 comes from MiniMax; Grok Code Fast 1 comes from xAI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.