Side-by-side comparison
MiniMax M2.5 vs KAT-Coder-Pro V2
Kwaipilot
KAT-Coder-Pro V2
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.3000
Output / 1M
$1.2000
| MiniMax M2.5 | KAT-Coder-Pro V2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Kwaipilot |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 196,608 | 256,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1500 | 0.3000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 1.1500 | 1.2000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.5 or KAT-Coder-Pro V2?
MiniMax M2.5 is cheaper than KAT-Coder-Pro V2 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.1 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, MiniMax M2.5 or KAT-Coder-Pro V2?
KAT-Coder-Pro V2 has the larger context window at 256k tokens versus 197k tokens for MiniMax M2.5. That means KAT-Coder-Pro V2 can ingest about 1.3x as much text per request.
What is the difference between MiniMax M2.5 and KAT-Coder-Pro V2?
MiniMax M2.5 comes from MiniMax; KAT-Coder-Pro V2 comes from Kwaipilot. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.