Side-by-side comparison
Phi 4 Mini Instruct vs Mistral Small 3
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini Instruct
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.0800
Output / 1M
$0.3500
| Phi 4 Mini Instruct | Mistral Small 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Mistral |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 128,000 | 32,768 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | json_mode | json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0800 | 0.0500 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.3500 | 0.0800 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Phi 4 Mini Instruct or Mistral Small 3?
Mistral Small 3 is cheaper than Phi 4 Mini Instruct on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.15 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Phi 4 Mini Instruct or Mistral Small 3?
Phi 4 Mini Instruct has the larger context window at 128k tokens versus 33k tokens for Mistral Small 3. That means Phi 4 Mini Instruct can ingest about 3.9x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Phi 4 Mini Instruct and Mistral Small 3?
Phi 4 Mini Instruct comes from Microsoft; Mistral Small 3 comes from Mistral. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.