Side-by-side comparison
Llama Guard 4 12B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B
Meta
Llama Guard 4 12B
👁 Vision
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1800
Output / 1M
$0.1800
Google
Gemma 4 26B A4B
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.0600
Output / 1M
$0.3300
| Llama Guard 4 12B | Gemma 4 26B A4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 163,840 | 262,144 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1800 | 0.0600 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.1800 | 0.3300 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Gemma 4 26B A4B ?
Llama Guard 4 12B is cheaper than Gemma 4 26B A4B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.015 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Llama Guard 4 12B or Gemma 4 26B A4B ?
Gemma 4 26B A4B has the larger context window at 262k tokens versus 164k tokens for Llama Guard 4 12B. That means Gemma 4 26B A4B can ingest about 1.6x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Llama Guard 4 12B and Gemma 4 26B A4B ?
Llama Guard 4 12B comes from Meta; Gemma 4 26B A4B comes from Google. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.