Side-by-side comparison
Llama 4 Maverick vs Grok 4.1 Fast
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick
👁 Vision
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1500
Output / 1M
$0.6000
xAI
Grok 4.1 Fast
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.2000
Output / 1M
$0.5000
| Llama 4 Maverick | Grok 4.1 Fast | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | xAI |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 1,048,576 | 2,000,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1500 | 0.2000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.6000 | 0.5000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Grok 4.1 Fast?
Grok 4.1 Fast is cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.025 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Llama 4 Maverick or Grok 4.1 Fast?
Grok 4.1 Fast has the larger context window at 2M tokens versus 1M tokens for Llama 4 Maverick. That means Grok 4.1 Fast can ingest about 1.9x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Llama 4 Maverick and Grok 4.1 Fast?
Llama 4 Maverick comes from Meta; Grok 4.1 Fast comes from xAI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.