Side-by-side comparison
Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen VL Plus
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick
👁 Vision
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1500
Output / 1M
$0.6000
| Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen VL Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Qwen |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 1,048,576 | 131,072 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, json_mode | vision, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1500 | 0.1365 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.6000 | 0.4095 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen VL Plus?
Qwen VL Plus is cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.102 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen VL Plus?
Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window at 1M tokens versus 131k tokens for Qwen VL Plus. That means Llama 4 Maverick can ingest about 8.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen VL Plus?
Llama 4 Maverick comes from Meta; Qwen VL Plus comes from Qwen. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.