Side-by-side comparison
KAT-Coder-Pro V2 vs MiniMax M2.1
Kwaipilot
KAT-Coder-Pro V2
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.3000
Output / 1M
$1.2000
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2 | MiniMax M2.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Kwaipilot | MiniMax |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 256,000 | 196,608 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.3000 | 0.2900 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 1.2000 | 0.9500 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, KAT-Coder-Pro V2 or MiniMax M2.1?
MiniMax M2.1 is cheaper than KAT-Coder-Pro V2 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.13 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, KAT-Coder-Pro V2 or MiniMax M2.1?
KAT-Coder-Pro V2 has the larger context window at 256k tokens versus 197k tokens for MiniMax M2.1. That means KAT-Coder-Pro V2 can ingest about 1.3x as much text per request.
What is the difference between KAT-Coder-Pro V2 and MiniMax M2.1?
KAT-Coder-Pro V2 comes from Kwaipilot; MiniMax M2.1 comes from MiniMax. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.