Side-by-side comparison
Inflection 3 Productivity vs Llama 3 70B Instruct
Inflection
Inflection 3 Productivity
Input / 1M
$2.5000
Output / 1M
$10.0000
| Inflection 3 Productivity | Llama 3 70B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inflection | Meta |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 8,000 | 8,192 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | text-only | text-only |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 2.5000 | 0.5100 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 10.0000 | 0.7400 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Inflection 3 Productivity or Llama 3 70B Instruct?
Llama 3 70B Instruct is cheaper than Inflection 3 Productivity on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $5.625 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Inflection 3 Productivity or Llama 3 70B Instruct?
Llama 3 70B Instruct has the larger context window at 8k tokens versus 8k tokens for Inflection 3 Productivity. That means Llama 3 70B Instruct can ingest about 1.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Inflection 3 Productivity and Llama 3 70B Instruct?
Inflection 3 Productivity comes from Inflection; Llama 3 70B Instruct comes from Meta. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.