Side-by-side comparison
Granite 4.0 Micro vs Gemma 3n 4B
| Granite 4.0 Micro | Gemma 3n 4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 131,000 | 32,768 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | text-only | text-only |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0170 | 0.0600 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.1100 | 0.1200 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Gemma 3n 4B?
Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper than Gemma 3n 4B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.0265 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Granite 4.0 Micro or Gemma 3n 4B?
Granite 4.0 Micro has the larger context window at 131k tokens versus 33k tokens for Gemma 3n 4B. That means Granite 4.0 Micro can ingest about 4.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Granite 4.0 Micro and Gemma 3n 4B?
Granite 4.0 Micro comes from IBM; Gemma 3n 4B comes from Google. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.