Side-by-side comparison
MythoMax 13B vs ReMM SLERP 13B
| MythoMax 13B | ReMM SLERP 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Gryphe | Undi95 |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 4,096 | 6,144 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | json_mode | json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0600 | 0.4500 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.0600 | 0.6500 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, MythoMax 13B or ReMM SLERP 13B?
MythoMax 13B is cheaper than ReMM SLERP 13B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.49 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, MythoMax 13B or ReMM SLERP 13B?
ReMM SLERP 13B has the larger context window at 6k tokens versus 4k tokens for MythoMax 13B. That means ReMM SLERP 13B can ingest about 1.5x as much text per request.
What is the difference between MythoMax 13B and ReMM SLERP 13B?
MythoMax 13B comes from Gryphe; ReMM SLERP 13B comes from Undi95. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.