Side-by-side comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3.5-9B
Google
Gemma 4 26B A4B
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.0600
Output / 1M
$0.3300
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | Qwen3.5-9B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 262,144 | 262,144 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0600 | 0.0400 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.3300 | 0.1500 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Qwen3.5-9B?
Qwen3.5-9B is cheaper than Gemma 4 26B A4B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.1 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
What is the difference between Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3.5-9B?
Gemma 4 26B A4B comes from Google; Qwen3.5-9B comes from Qwen. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.