Side-by-side comparison
Gemma 2 27B vs R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
R1 Distill Qwen 32B
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.2900
Output / 1M
$0.2900
| Gemma 2 27B | R1 Distill Qwen 32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 8,192 | 32,768 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | json_mode | json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.6500 | 0.2900 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.6500 | 0.2900 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or R1 Distill Qwen 32B?
R1 Distill Qwen 32B is cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.36 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Gemma 2 27B or R1 Distill Qwen 32B?
R1 Distill Qwen 32B has the larger context window at 33k tokens versus 8k tokens for Gemma 2 27B. That means R1 Distill Qwen 32B can ingest about 4.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Gemma 2 27B and R1 Distill Qwen 32B?
Gemma 2 27B comes from Google; R1 Distill Qwen 32B comes from DeepSeek. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.