Side-by-side comparison
Google Gemini Flash Latest vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Google
Google Gemini Flash Latest
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.5000
Output / 1M
$3.0000
Qwen
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.3000
Output / 1M
$1.8000
| Google Gemini Flash Latest | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 1,048,576 | 1,000,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.5000 | 0.3000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 3.0000 | 1.8000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Google Gemini Flash Latest or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 is cheaper than Google Gemini Flash Latest on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.7 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Google Gemini Flash Latest or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?
Google Gemini Flash Latest has the larger context window at 1M tokens versus 1M tokens for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20. That means Google Gemini Flash Latest can ingest about 1.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Google Gemini Flash Latest and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?
Google Gemini Flash Latest comes from Google; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 comes from Qwen. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.