Side-by-side comparison
Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Kimi K2.6
Google
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.5000
Output / 1M
$3.0000
MoonshotAI
Kimi K2.6
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.7300
Output / 1M
$3.4900
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Kimi K2.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MoonshotAI | |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 1,048,576 | 262,142 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.5000 | 0.7300 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 3.0000 | 3.4900 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Kimi K2.6?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.36 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Kimi K2.6?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview has the larger context window at 1M tokens versus 262k tokens for Kimi K2.6. That means Gemini 3 Flash Preview can ingest about 4.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Kimi K2.6?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview comes from Google; Kimi K2.6 comes from MoonshotAI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.