Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs MiMo-V2.5
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MiMo-V2.5
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary β | 1,048,576 | 1,048,576 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary β | 0.2500 | 0.4000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3β5Γ pricier than input. Glossary β | 1.5000 | 2.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or MiMo-V2.5?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is cheaper than MiMo-V2.5 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.325 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio β use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
What is the difference between Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and MiMo-V2.5?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview comes from Google; MiMo-V2.5 comes from Xiaomi. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities β see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.