Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
| Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) | Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 65,536 | 32,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, json_mode | vision, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.5000 | 0.2500 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 3.0000 | 0.7500 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is cheaper than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $1.25 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) has the larger context window at 66k tokens versus 32k tokens for Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct. That means Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) can ingest about 2.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) comes from Google; Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct comes from Qwen. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.