Side-by-side comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$1.2500
Output / 1M
$10.0000
xAI
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
👁 Vision
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$2.0000
Output / 1M
$6.0000
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 1,048,576 | 2,000,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 1.2500 | 2.0000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 10.0000 | 6.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $1.625 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has the larger context window at 2M tokens versus 1M tokens for Gemini 2.5 Pro. That means Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent can ingest about 1.9x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Gemini 2.5 Pro and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Gemini 2.5 Pro comes from Google; Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent comes from xAI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.