Side-by-side comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Grok 4.1 Fast
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1000
Output / 1M
$0.4000
xAI
Grok 4.1 Fast
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.2000
Output / 1M
$0.5000
| Gemini 2.0 Flash | Grok 4.1 Fast | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 1,048,576 | 2,000,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1000 | 0.2000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.4000 | 0.5000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.0 Flash or Grok 4.1 Fast?
Gemini 2.0 Flash is cheaper than Grok 4.1 Fast on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.1 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 2.0 Flash or Grok 4.1 Fast?
Grok 4.1 Fast has the larger context window at 2M tokens versus 1M tokens for Gemini 2.0 Flash. That means Grok 4.1 Fast can ingest about 1.9x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Gemini 2.0 Flash and Grok 4.1 Fast?
Gemini 2.0 Flash comes from Google; Grok 4.1 Fast comes from xAI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.