Side-by-side comparison
DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) vs Owl Alpha
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V4 Flash (free)
🔧 Tools
Input / 1M
$0.0000
Output / 1M
$0.0000
| DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) | Owl Alpha | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Openrouter |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 1,048,576 | 1,048,756 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) or Owl Alpha?
DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) is cheaper than Owl Alpha on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) or Owl Alpha?
Owl Alpha has the larger context window at 1M tokens versus 1M tokens for DeepSeek V4 Flash (free). That means Owl Alpha can ingest about 1.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) and Owl Alpha?
DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) comes from DeepSeek; Owl Alpha comes from Openrouter. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.