Side-by-side comparison
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Qwen3 Coder Flash
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.2700
Output / 1M
$0.9500
Qwen
Qwen3 Coder Flash
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1950
Output / 1M
$0.9750
| DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | Qwen3 Coder Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Qwen |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 163,840 | 1,000,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.2700 | 0.1950 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.9500 | 0.9750 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Qwen3 Coder Flash?
Qwen3 Coder Flash is cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.025 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Qwen3 Coder Flash?
Qwen3 Coder Flash has the larger context window at 1M tokens versus 164k tokens for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus. That means Qwen3 Coder Flash can ingest about 6.1x as much text per request.
What is the difference between DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Qwen3 Coder Flash?
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus comes from DeepSeek; Qwen3 Coder Flash comes from Qwen. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.