Side-by-side comparison
R1 0528 vs GPT Audio Mini
| R1 0528 | GPT Audio Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 163,840 | 128,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.5000 | 0.6000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 2.1500 | 2.4000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, R1 0528 or GPT Audio Mini?
R1 0528 is cheaper than GPT Audio Mini on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.175 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, R1 0528 or GPT Audio Mini?
R1 0528 has the larger context window at 164k tokens versus 128k tokens for GPT Audio Mini. That means R1 0528 can ingest about 1.3x as much text per request.
What is the difference between R1 0528 and GPT Audio Mini?
R1 0528 comes from DeepSeek; GPT Audio Mini comes from OpenAI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.