Side-by-side comparison
Cogito v2.1 671B vs Hunyuan A13B Instruct
Tencent
Hunyuan A13B Instruct
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1400
Output / 1M
$0.5700
| Cogito v2.1 671B | Hunyuan A13B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Deep Cogito | Tencent |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 128,000 | 131,072 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | json_mode | json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 1.2500 | 0.1400 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 1.2500 | 0.5700 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Cogito v2.1 671B or Hunyuan A13B Instruct?
Hunyuan A13B Instruct is cheaper than Cogito v2.1 671B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.895 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Cogito v2.1 671B or Hunyuan A13B Instruct?
Hunyuan A13B Instruct has the larger context window at 131k tokens versus 128k tokens for Cogito v2.1 671B. That means Hunyuan A13B Instruct can ingest about 1.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Cogito v2.1 671B and Hunyuan A13B Instruct?
Cogito v2.1 671B comes from Deep Cogito; Hunyuan A13B Instruct comes from Tencent. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.