Side-by-side comparison
ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B vs Spotlight
Baidu Qianfan
ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B
👁 Vision
Input / 1M
$0.4200
Output / 1M
$1.2500
| ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B | Spotlight | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu Qianfan | Arcee AI |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 123,000 | 131,072 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision | vision |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.4200 | 0.1800 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 1.2500 | 0.1800 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B or Spotlight?
Spotlight is cheaper than ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.655 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B or Spotlight?
Spotlight has the larger context window at 131k tokens versus 123k tokens for ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B . That means Spotlight can ingest about 1.1x as much text per request.
What is the difference between ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B and Spotlight?
ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B comes from Baidu Qianfan; Spotlight comes from Arcee AI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.