Side-by-side comparison
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B vs GPT-4o-mini
Baidu Qianfan
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
Input / 1M
$0.1400
Output / 1M
$0.5600
OpenAI
GPT-4o-mini
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1500
Output / 1M
$0.6000
| ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B | GPT-4o-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu Qianfan | OpenAI |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 30,000 | 128,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1400 | 0.1500 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.5600 | 0.6000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B or GPT-4o-mini?
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B is cheaper than GPT-4o-mini on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.025 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B or GPT-4o-mini?
GPT-4o-mini has the larger context window at 128k tokens versus 30k tokens for ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B. That means GPT-4o-mini can ingest about 4.3x as much text per request.
What is the difference between ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B and GPT-4o-mini?
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B comes from Baidu Qianfan; GPT-4o-mini comes from OpenAI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.