Side-by-side comparison
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Cydonia 24B V4.1
| ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B | Cydonia 24B V4.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu Qianfan | TheDrummer |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 123,000 | 131,072 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | text-only | text-only |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.2800 | 0.3000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 1.1000 | 0.5000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B or Cydonia 24B V4.1?
Cydonia 24B V4.1 is cheaper than ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.29 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B or Cydonia 24B V4.1?
Cydonia 24B V4.1 has the larger context window at 131k tokens versus 123k tokens for ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B . That means Cydonia 24B V4.1 can ingest about 1.1x as much text per request.
What is the difference between ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Cydonia 24B V4.1?
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B comes from Baidu Qianfan; Cydonia 24B V4.1 comes from TheDrummer. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.