Side-by-side comparison
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Morph V3 Large
| ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B | Morph V3 Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu Qianfan | Morph |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 123,000 | 262,144 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | text-only | text-only |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.2800 | 0.9000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 1.1000 | 1.9000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B or Morph V3 Large?
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper than Morph V3 Large on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.71 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B or Morph V3 Large?
Morph V3 Large has the larger context window at 262k tokens versus 123k tokens for ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B . That means Morph V3 Large can ingest about 2.1x as much text per request.
What is the difference between ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Morph V3 Large?
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B comes from Baidu Qianfan; Morph V3 Large comes from Morph. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.