Side-by-side comparison
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Morph V3 Fast
| ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B | Morph V3 Fast | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu Qianfan | Morph |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 123,000 | 81,920 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | text-only | text-only |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.2800 | 0.8000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 1.1000 | 1.2000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B or Morph V3 Fast?
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper than Morph V3 Fast on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.31 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B or Morph V3 Fast?
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has the larger context window at 123k tokens versus 82k tokens for Morph V3 Fast. That means ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B can ingest about 1.5x as much text per request.
What is the difference between ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Morph V3 Fast?
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B comes from Baidu Qianfan; Morph V3 Fast comes from Morph. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.