Side-by-side comparison
CoBuddy (free) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash (free)
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V4 Flash (free)
🔧 Tools
Input / 1M
$0.0000
Output / 1M
$0.0000
| CoBuddy (free) | DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu Qianfan | DeepSeek |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 131,072 | 1,048,576 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools | tools |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, CoBuddy (free) or DeepSeek V4 Flash (free)?
CoBuddy (free) is cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, CoBuddy (free) or DeepSeek V4 Flash (free)?
DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) has the larger context window at 1M tokens versus 131k tokens for CoBuddy (free). That means DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) can ingest about 8.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between CoBuddy (free) and DeepSeek V4 Flash (free)?
CoBuddy (free) comes from Baidu Qianfan; DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) comes from DeepSeek. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.