Side-by-side comparison
Virtuoso Large vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Qwen
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.2200
Output / 1M
$1.8000
| Virtuoso Large | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Arcee AI | Qwen |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 131,072 | 262,144 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.7500 | 0.2200 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 1.2000 | 1.8000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Virtuoso Large or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?
Virtuoso Large is cheaper than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.035 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Virtuoso Large or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B has the larger context window at 262k tokens versus 131k tokens for Virtuoso Large. That means Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B can ingest about 2.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Virtuoso Large and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?
Virtuoso Large comes from Arcee AI; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B comes from Qwen. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.