Side-by-side comparison
Trinity Large Thinking (free) vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct (free)
Arcee AI
Trinity Large Thinking (free)
🔧 Tools
Input / 1M
$0.0000
Output / 1M
$0.0000
Qwen
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct (free)
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.0000
Output / 1M
$0.0000
| Trinity Large Thinking (free) | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct (free) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Arcee AI | Qwen |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 262,144 | 262,144 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Trinity Large Thinking (free) or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct (free)?
Trinity Large Thinking (free) is cheaper than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct (free) on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
What is the difference between Trinity Large Thinking (free) and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct (free)?
Trinity Large Thinking (free) comes from Arcee AI; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct (free) comes from Qwen. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.