Side-by-side comparison
Trinity Large Preview vs Rocinante 12B
Arcee AI
Trinity Large Preview
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1500
Output / 1M
$0.4500
TheDrummer
Rocinante 12B
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.1700
Output / 1M
$0.4300
| Trinity Large Preview | Rocinante 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Arcee AI | TheDrummer |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 131,000 | 32,768 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1500 | 0.1700 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.4500 | 0.4300 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Trinity Large Preview or Rocinante 12B?
Trinity Large Preview is cheaper than Rocinante 12B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Trinity Large Preview or Rocinante 12B?
Trinity Large Preview has the larger context window at 131k tokens versus 33k tokens for Rocinante 12B. That means Trinity Large Preview can ingest about 4.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Trinity Large Preview and Rocinante 12B?
Trinity Large Preview comes from Arcee AI; Rocinante 12B comes from TheDrummer. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.