Side-by-side comparison
Spotlight vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Mistral
Mistral Small 3.1 24B
👁 Vision
Input / 1M
$0.3500
Output / 1M
$0.5600
| Spotlight | Mistral Small 3.1 24B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Arcee AI | Mistral |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 131,072 | 128,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision | vision |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.1800 | 0.3500 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.1800 | 0.5600 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Spotlight or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?
Spotlight is cheaper than Mistral Small 3.1 24B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.275 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Spotlight or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?
Spotlight has the larger context window at 131k tokens versus 128k tokens for Mistral Small 3.1 24B. That means Spotlight can ingest about 1.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Spotlight and Mistral Small 3.1 24B?
Spotlight comes from Arcee AI; Mistral Small 3.1 24B comes from Mistral. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.