Side-by-side comparison
Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest vs Google Gemini Pro Latest
Anthropic
Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$3.0000
Output / 1M
$15.0000
Google
Google Gemini Pro Latest
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$2.0000
Output / 1M
$12.0000
| Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest | Google Gemini Pro Latest | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 1,000,000 | 1,048,576 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 3.0000 | 2.0000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 15.0000 | 12.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest or Google Gemini Pro Latest?
Google Gemini Pro Latest is cheaper than Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $2 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest or Google Gemini Pro Latest?
Google Gemini Pro Latest has the larger context window at 1M tokens versus 1M tokens for Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest. That means Google Gemini Pro Latest can ingest about 1.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest and Google Gemini Pro Latest?
Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest comes from Anthropic; Google Gemini Pro Latest comes from Google. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.