Side-by-side comparison
Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest vs Pixtral Large 2411
Anthropic
Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$1.0000
Output / 1M
$5.0000
Mistral
Pixtral Large 2411
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$2.0000
Output / 1M
$6.0000
| Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest | Pixtral Large 2411 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Mistral |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 200,000 | 131,072 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools, json_mode | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 1.0000 | 2.0000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 5.0000 | 6.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest or Pixtral Large 2411?
Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest is cheaper than Pixtral Large 2411 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $1 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest or Pixtral Large 2411?
Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest has the larger context window at 200k tokens versus 131k tokens for Pixtral Large 2411. That means Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest can ingest about 1.5x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest and Pixtral Large 2411?
Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest comes from Anthropic; Pixtral Large 2411 comes from Mistral. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.