Side-by-side comparison
Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen3.5-27B
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
Input / 1M
$0.2500
Output / 1M
$1.2500
| Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen3.5-27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Qwen |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 200,000 | 262,144 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.2500 | 0.1950 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 1.2500 | 1.5600 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Claude 3 Haiku or Qwen3.5-27B?
Claude 3 Haiku is cheaper than Qwen3.5-27B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.1275 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Claude 3 Haiku or Qwen3.5-27B?
Qwen3.5-27B has the larger context window at 262k tokens versus 200k tokens for Claude 3 Haiku. That means Qwen3.5-27B can ingest about 1.3x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen3.5-27B?
Claude 3 Haiku comes from Anthropic; Qwen3.5-27B comes from Qwen. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.