Side-by-side comparison
Claude 3 Haiku vs ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
Input / 1M
$0.2500
Output / 1M
$1.2500
Baidu Qianfan
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
Input / 1M
$0.1400
Output / 1M
$0.5600
| Claude 3 Haiku | ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Baidu Qianfan |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 200,000 | 30,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools | vision, tools |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.2500 | 0.1400 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 1.2500 | 0.5600 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Claude 3 Haiku or ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B?
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B is cheaper than Claude 3 Haiku on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.4 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Claude 3 Haiku or ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B?
Claude 3 Haiku has the larger context window at 200k tokens versus 30k tokens for ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B. That means Claude 3 Haiku can ingest about 6.7x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Claude 3 Haiku and ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B?
Claude 3 Haiku comes from Anthropic; ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B comes from Baidu Qianfan. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.