Side-by-side comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) vs Nova Premier 1.0
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
Input / 1M
$3.0000
Output / 1M
$15.0000
Amazon
Nova Premier 1.0
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
Input / 1M
$2.5000
Output / 1M
$12.5000
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) | Nova Premier 1.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Amazon |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 200,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools | vision, tools |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 3.0000 | 2.5000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 15.0000 | 12.5000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) or Nova Premier 1.0?
Nova Premier 1.0 is cheaper than Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $1.5 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) or Nova Premier 1.0?
Nova Premier 1.0 has the larger context window at 1M tokens versus 200k tokens for Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking). That means Nova Premier 1.0 can ingest about 5.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) and Nova Premier 1.0?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) comes from Anthropic; Nova Premier 1.0 comes from Amazon. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.