Side-by-side comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GLM 5V Turbo
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
Input / 1M
$0.8000
Output / 1M
$4.0000
Z.ai
GLM 5V Turbo
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$1.2000
Output / 1M
$4.0000
| Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM 5V Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Z.ai |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 200,000 | 202,752 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.8000 | 1.2000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 4.0000 | 4.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Haiku or GLM 5V Turbo?
Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper than GLM 5V Turbo on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.2 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Claude 3.5 Haiku or GLM 5V Turbo?
GLM 5V Turbo has the larger context window at 203k tokens versus 200k tokens for Claude 3.5 Haiku. That means GLM 5V Turbo can ingest about 1.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Claude 3.5 Haiku and GLM 5V Turbo?
Claude 3.5 Haiku comes from Anthropic; GLM 5V Turbo comes from Z.ai. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.