Side-by-side comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs OpenAI GPT Mini Latest
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
Input / 1M
$0.8000
Output / 1M
$4.0000
OpenAI
OpenAI GPT Mini Latest
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.7500
Output / 1M
$4.5000
| Claude 3.5 Haiku | OpenAI GPT Mini Latest | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 200,000 | 400,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.8000 | 0.7500 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 4.0000 | 4.5000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Haiku or OpenAI GPT Mini Latest?
Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper than OpenAI GPT Mini Latest on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.225 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Claude 3.5 Haiku or OpenAI GPT Mini Latest?
OpenAI GPT Mini Latest has the larger context window at 400k tokens versus 200k tokens for Claude 3.5 Haiku. That means OpenAI GPT Mini Latest can ingest about 2.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Claude 3.5 Haiku and OpenAI GPT Mini Latest?
Claude 3.5 Haiku comes from Anthropic; OpenAI GPT Mini Latest comes from OpenAI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.