Side-by-side comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs MoonshotAI Kimi Latest
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
Input / 1M
$0.8000
Output / 1M
$4.0000
MoonshotAI
MoonshotAI Kimi Latest
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.7300
Output / 1M
$3.4900
| Claude 3.5 Haiku | MoonshotAI Kimi Latest | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | MoonshotAI |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 200,000 | 262,142 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.8000 | 0.7300 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 4.0000 | 3.4900 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Haiku or MoonshotAI Kimi Latest?
MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.29 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Claude 3.5 Haiku or MoonshotAI Kimi Latest?
MoonshotAI Kimi Latest has the larger context window at 262k tokens versus 200k tokens for Claude 3.5 Haiku. That means MoonshotAI Kimi Latest can ingest about 1.3x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Claude 3.5 Haiku and MoonshotAI Kimi Latest?
Claude 3.5 Haiku comes from Anthropic; MoonshotAI Kimi Latest comes from MoonshotAI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.