Side-by-side comparison
Nova Pro 1.0 vs Qwen3.6 27B
| Nova Pro 1.0 | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Qwen |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 300,000 | 262,144 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.8000 | 0.3200 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 3.2000 | 3.2000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Nova Pro 1.0 or Qwen3.6 27B?
Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper than Nova Pro 1.0 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.24 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Nova Pro 1.0 or Qwen3.6 27B?
Nova Pro 1.0 has the larger context window at 300k tokens versus 262k tokens for Qwen3.6 27B. That means Nova Pro 1.0 can ingest about 1.1x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3.6 27B?
Nova Pro 1.0 comes from Amazon; Qwen3.6 27B comes from Qwen. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.