Side-by-side comparison
Nova Micro 1.0 vs ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B
Baidu Qianfan
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B
🔧 Tools
Input / 1M
$0.0700
Output / 1M
$0.2800
| Nova Micro 1.0 | ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Baidu Qianfan |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 128,000 | 120,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools | tools |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0350 | 0.0700 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.1400 | 0.2800 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Nova Micro 1.0 or ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B?
Nova Micro 1.0 is cheaper than ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.0875 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Nova Micro 1.0 or ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B?
Nova Micro 1.0 has the larger context window at 128k tokens versus 120k tokens for ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B. That means Nova Micro 1.0 can ingest about 1.1x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Nova Micro 1.0 and ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B?
Nova Micro 1.0 comes from Amazon; ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B comes from Baidu Qianfan. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.