Side-by-side comparison
Nova Micro 1.0 vs Trinity Mini
| Nova Micro 1.0 | Trinity Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Arcee AI |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 128,000 | 131,072 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0350 | 0.0450 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.1400 | 0.1500 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Nova Micro 1.0 or Trinity Mini?
Nova Micro 1.0 is cheaper than Trinity Mini on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.01 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Nova Micro 1.0 or Trinity Mini?
Trinity Mini has the larger context window at 131k tokens versus 128k tokens for Nova Micro 1.0. That means Trinity Mini can ingest about 1.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Nova Micro 1.0 and Trinity Mini?
Nova Micro 1.0 comes from Amazon; Trinity Mini comes from Arcee AI. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.