Side-by-side comparison
Nova Lite 1.0 vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B
Mistral
Mistral Small 3.2 24B
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.0750
Output / 1M
$0.2000
| Nova Lite 1.0 | Mistral Small 3.2 24B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Mistral |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 300,000 | 128,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools | vision, tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0600 | 0.0750 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.2400 | 0.2000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Nova Lite 1.0 or Mistral Small 3.2 24B?
Mistral Small 3.2 24B is cheaper than Nova Lite 1.0 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.0125 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Nova Lite 1.0 or Mistral Small 3.2 24B?
Nova Lite 1.0 has the larger context window at 300k tokens versus 128k tokens for Mistral Small 3.2 24B. That means Nova Lite 1.0 can ingest about 2.3x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Nova Lite 1.0 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B?
Nova Lite 1.0 comes from Amazon; Mistral Small 3.2 24B comes from Mistral. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.