Side-by-side comparison
Nova Lite 1.0 vs UI-TARS 7B
| Nova Lite 1.0 | UI-TARS 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | ByteDance |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 300,000 | 128,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools | vision |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0600 | 0.1000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.2400 | 0.2000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Nova Lite 1.0 or UI-TARS 7B ?
Nova Lite 1.0 is cheaper than UI-TARS 7B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Nova Lite 1.0 or UI-TARS 7B ?
Nova Lite 1.0 has the larger context window at 300k tokens versus 128k tokens for UI-TARS 7B . That means Nova Lite 1.0 can ingest about 2.3x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Nova Lite 1.0 and UI-TARS 7B ?
Nova Lite 1.0 comes from Amazon; UI-TARS 7B comes from ByteDance. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.