Side-by-side comparison
Nova Lite 1.0 vs Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4
👁 Vision
🔧 Tools
Input / 1M
$15.0000
Output / 1M
$75.0000
| Nova Lite 1.0 | Claude Opus 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Anthropic |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 300,000 | 200,000 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | vision, tools | vision, tools |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0600 | 15.0000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.2400 | 75.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Nova Lite 1.0 or Claude Opus 4?
Nova Lite 1.0 is cheaper than Claude Opus 4 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $44.85 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Nova Lite 1.0 or Claude Opus 4?
Nova Lite 1.0 has the larger context window at 300k tokens versus 200k tokens for Claude Opus 4. That means Nova Lite 1.0 can ingest about 1.5x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Nova Lite 1.0 and Claude Opus 4?
Nova Lite 1.0 comes from Amazon; Claude Opus 4 comes from Anthropic. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.