Side-by-side comparison
Tongyi DeepResearch 30B A3B vs GLM 4.7 Flash
Alibaba
Tongyi DeepResearch 30B A3B
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$0.0900
Output / 1M
$0.4500
| Tongyi DeepResearch 30B A3B | GLM 4.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Z.ai |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 131,072 | 202,752 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 0.0900 | 0.0600 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 0.4500 | 0.4000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Tongyi DeepResearch 30B A3B or GLM 4.7 Flash?
GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper than Tongyi DeepResearch 30B A3B on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $0.04 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Tongyi DeepResearch 30B A3B or GLM 4.7 Flash?
GLM 4.7 Flash has the larger context window at 203k tokens versus 131k tokens for Tongyi DeepResearch 30B A3B. That means GLM 4.7 Flash can ingest about 1.5x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Tongyi DeepResearch 30B A3B and GLM 4.7 Flash?
Tongyi DeepResearch 30B A3B comes from Alibaba; GLM 4.7 Flash comes from Z.ai. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.