Side-by-side comparison
Jamba Large 1.7 vs Mistral Large 2411
Mistral
Mistral Large 2411
🔧 Tools
{} JSON
Input / 1M
$2.0000
Output / 1M
$6.0000
| Jamba Large 1.7 | Mistral Large 2411 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | AI21 | Mistral |
| Context window Maximum tokens (input + output) the model can process in a single request. Glossary → | 256,000 | 131,072 |
| Capabilities Optional capabilities the model advertises: vision (images), tools (function calling), json_mode (structured output). | tools, json_mode | tools, json_mode |
| Input $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens you send (prompt + context). Cheaper side highlighted. Glossary → | 2.0000 | 2.0000 |
| Output $ / 1M tokens Cost for tokens the model generates. Output is normally 3–5× pricier than input. Glossary → | 8.0000 | 6.0000 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Jamba Large 1.7 or Mistral Large 2411?
Mistral Large 2411 is cheaper than Jamba Large 1.7 on a 50/50 input/output blend by about $1 per 1M tokens. Exact savings depend on your input-vs-output ratio — use the cost calculator on this page for a workload-specific estimate.
Which has a larger context window, Jamba Large 1.7 or Mistral Large 2411?
Jamba Large 1.7 has the larger context window at 256k tokens versus 131k tokens for Mistral Large 2411. That means Jamba Large 1.7 can ingest about 2.0x as much text per request.
What is the difference between Jamba Large 1.7 and Mistral Large 2411?
Jamba Large 1.7 comes from AI21; Mistral Large 2411 comes from Mistral. They differ in pricing, context window, and supported capabilities — see the side-by-side table on this page for the exact figures, refreshed nightly.