L LLM Cloud Hub
Use case

Best LLM for vision / ocr / image analysis

Image (or image + text) in, structured output.

Why this ranking is opinionated

Vision capability is mandatory; quality varies dramatically across models. Text-recognition (OCR) is largely solved; nuanced visual reasoning (diagrams, charts) is not.

required: vision Model accepts images alongside text. Glossary → min ctx: 32,000 Models below this context window are filtered out — your prompt + retrieved context must fit. Glossary →
Compliance constraints (optional)

Top 5 recommendations

ranked by monthly cost at this workload
#1 · Baidu Qianfan
Qianfan-OCR-Fast (free)
65,536 ctx · $0.0000 in / $0.0000 out per 1M
👁 Vision
Monthly cost
$0.00
  • · Cheapest qualifying option at this workload (~$0.00/mo).
#2 · Google
Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)
262,144 ctx · $0.0000 in / $0.0000 out per 1M
👁 Vision 🔧 Tools {} JSON
Monthly cost
$0.00
  • · ~$0.00/mo (+0% over the cheapest option).
  • · 262,144 tokens of context — far above this use case's 32,000-token minimum.
#3 · Google
Gemma 4 31B (free)
262,144 ctx · $0.0000 in / $0.0000 out per 1M
👁 Vision 🔧 Tools {} JSON
Monthly cost
$0.00
  • · ~$0.00/mo (+0% over the cheapest option).
  • · 262,144 tokens of context — far above this use case's 32,000-token minimum.
#4 · Google
Lyria 3 Clip Preview
1,048,576 ctx · $0.0000 in / $0.0000 out per 1M
👁 Vision {} JSON
Monthly cost
$0.00
  • · ~$0.00/mo (+0% over the cheapest option).
  • · 1,048,576 tokens of context — far above this use case's 32,000-token minimum.
#5 · Google
Lyria 3 Pro Preview
1,048,576 ctx · $0.0000 in / $0.0000 out per 1M
👁 Vision {} JSON
Monthly cost
$0.00
  • · ~$0.00/mo (+0% over the cheapest option).
  • · 1,048,576 tokens of context — far above this use case's 32,000-token minimum.

Frequently asked questions

What makes a good LLM for vision / ocr / image analysis?

Vision capability is mandatory; quality varies dramatically across models. Text-recognition (OCR) is largely solved; nuanced visual reasoning (diagrams, charts) is not.

What capabilities matter most for vision / ocr / image analysis?

For vision / ocr / image analysis the typical filters are: vision, and a context window of at least 32k tokens. The ranking on this page weights monthly cost (at the workload defaults shown above) most heavily, then capability fit.

What is currently the cheapest LLM for vision / ocr / image analysis?

At the typical workload defaults, Qianfan-OCR-Fast (free) from Baidu Qianfan ranks cheapest right now (~$0 / month). Plug your own monthly token volumes into the calculator on this page for a workload-specific number.

Is the cheapest LLM always the right choice for vision / ocr / image analysis?

Not always. Cheap models often trade off reasoning quality, tool reliability, or context size. Use the cheapest as a baseline and benchmark against a tier-up model on your own evaluation set before committing to a contract — quality differences compound over millions of tokens.

Keyboard shortcuts

?
Show this overlay
/
Focus the first form field
g h
Go to / (home)
g b
Go to /best-llm-for
g c
Go to /cost
g s
Go to /self-hosted
g x
Go to /compliance
Esc
Close any overlay

Inspired by Linear and GitHub conventions. The two-key sequences (g then h) work within ~1 second.