L LLM Cloud Hub
Use case

Best LLM for structured data extraction

Unstructured text in, validated JSON out.

Why this ranking is opinionated

Reliability of JSON output is the dominant concern — a model with native JSON mode produces fewer parse errors and lower retry rates. Quality of free-text reasoning matters less.

required: json_mode Forces output to be valid JSON, reducing parse errors. Glossary → preferred: tools Bonus if present, not required. Glossary → min ctx: 16,000 Models below this context window are filtered out — your prompt + retrieved context must fit. Glossary →
Compliance constraints (optional)

Top 5 recommendations

ranked by monthly cost at this workload
#1 · Venice
Uncensored (free)
32,768 ctx · $0.0000 in / $0.0000 out per 1M
{} JSON
Monthly cost
$0.00
  • · Cheapest qualifying option at this workload (~$0.00/mo).
  • · Missing preferred: tools — may need a workaround.
#2 · Google
Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)
262,144 ctx · $0.0000 in / $0.0000 out per 1M
👁 Vision 🔧 Tools {} JSON
Monthly cost
$0.00
  • · ~$0.00/mo (+0% over the cheapest option).
  • · 262,144 tokens of context — far above this use case's 16,000-token minimum.
  • · Supports preferred capabilities: tools.
#3 · Google
Gemma 4 31B (free)
262,144 ctx · $0.0000 in / $0.0000 out per 1M
👁 Vision 🔧 Tools {} JSON
Monthly cost
$0.00
  • · ~$0.00/mo (+0% over the cheapest option).
  • · 262,144 tokens of context — far above this use case's 16,000-token minimum.
  • · Supports preferred capabilities: tools.
#4 · Google
Lyria 3 Clip Preview
1,048,576 ctx · $0.0000 in / $0.0000 out per 1M
👁 Vision {} JSON
Monthly cost
$0.00
  • · ~$0.00/mo (+0% over the cheapest option).
  • · 1,048,576 tokens of context — far above this use case's 16,000-token minimum.
  • · Missing preferred: tools — may need a workaround.
#5 · Google
Lyria 3 Pro Preview
1,048,576 ctx · $0.0000 in / $0.0000 out per 1M
👁 Vision {} JSON
Monthly cost
$0.00
  • · ~$0.00/mo (+0% over the cheapest option).
  • · 1,048,576 tokens of context — far above this use case's 16,000-token minimum.
  • · Missing preferred: tools — may need a workaround.

Frequently asked questions

What makes a good LLM for structured data extraction?

Reliability of JSON output is the dominant concern — a model with native JSON mode produces fewer parse errors and lower retry rates. Quality of free-text reasoning matters less.

What capabilities matter most for structured data extraction?

For structured data extraction the typical filters are: json_mode, and a context window of at least 16k tokens. The ranking on this page weights monthly cost (at the workload defaults shown above) most heavily, then capability fit.

What is currently the cheapest LLM for structured data extraction?

At the typical workload defaults, Uncensored (free) from Venice ranks cheapest right now (~$0 / month). Plug your own monthly token volumes into the calculator on this page for a workload-specific number.

Is the cheapest LLM always the right choice for structured data extraction?

Not always. Cheap models often trade off reasoning quality, tool reliability, or context size. Use the cheapest as a baseline and benchmark against a tier-up model on your own evaluation set before committing to a contract — quality differences compound over millions of tokens.

Keyboard shortcuts

?
Show this overlay
/
Focus the first form field
g h
Go to / (home)
g b
Go to /best-llm-for
g c
Go to /cost
g s
Go to /self-hosted
g x
Go to /compliance
Esc
Close any overlay

Inspired by Linear and GitHub conventions. The two-key sequences (g then h) work within ~1 second.